12 Best Financial Planning Tools for Contractors


Key takeaways:
Ask a contractor what financial planning means and you get a practical answer. Will the Henderson job clear its margin? Can we afford a second truck in March? Is there enough in the account to cover payroll if the March invoices pay late again?
Search for the same phrase and you get something else entirely. The first page is retirement calculators, wealth advisors and net-worth trackers, and the AI Overview names Vanguard's nest egg calculator, Social Security and a handful of retirement apps. That is personal finance, and it has nothing to do with whether your business survives a slow February.
So this list ignores the search results and covers business financial planning instead. Procured is ours, a field service platform built for the trades, and we have placed it at number one, which is a bias to read with.
After that the order runs by price, from a free tier up to platforms that cost more than a truck. Our own answer is narrow and we say so in the entry: we record what each job earned and spent, and we do not forecast anything.
The phrase covers two jobs that get sold together, and separating them saves you a lot of money.
Financial management tools handle today's money. They record what came in and what went out, chase invoices, and sync to your accounting file. The work is capture and accuracy, and the output is a true picture of last month. Finance automation tools sit here too, taking receipts and bills off somebody's desk.
Financial planning solutions look forward. They take the history in your books and build a forecast, a budget or a scenario, and they are only as good as the records underneath. Financial forecasting tools and budget planning tools are the working end of this half, and financial consolidation tools join several entities into one view.
In a trades business of any size short of fifty people, the first category is usually where the money quietly goes. If you cannot say what a finished job cost you, a five-year model built on top of that is a confident-looking guess. Getting the markup and margin arithmetic right matters more than any chart drawn above it.
The second earns its place once the books are trustworthy and the question becomes what happens next. Cash timing is usually the trigger. A contractor who invoices in March and gets paid in June has a working capital problem that no amount of profit fixes, and that is a forecasting question rather than a bookkeeping one.
Twelve tools, with cost, the catch, and whether each connects to QuickBooks Desktop, which is still common in the trades and is the single most useful filter in this category. Every figure was read off the vendor's own page during October 2026, taking the lower of its monthly and annual rates wherever it publishes both.
Tool | Best for | Key features | Main limitation | Pricing (from) | Connects to QuickBooks Desktop? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Procured | Knowing what a job actually cost | Job records, revenue and expense tracking, accounting sync | No forecasting, budgeting or consolidation | $49/mo, 1 user | Not stated |
Ramp | Controlling spend before it happens | Corporate cards, bill pay, job budgets | Budgets need the paid tier | $0, Plus $15/user/mo | Yes |
Syft Analytics | Reporting on a small budget | Free tier, consolidation, cash flow forecasting | One rate per plan, with no annual-billing discount | $0, Standard $23/mo | Yes |
LivePlan | Writing the plan a lender asks for | Business plan builder, forecast, pitch | Connections and budget-vs-actual are Premium | $15/mo billed annually | No, support ended 2022 |
Fathom | Management reports you can hand over | Three-way forecasting, KPIs, benchmarking | Priced per company, not per user | $59/mo per company | Yes |
PlanGuru | Long-range budgeting | 10-year budgets, unlimited scenarios | The cloud app is online accounting only | $83/mo billed annually | Desktop edition only |
Float | Seeing the cash runway | 13-week cash flow, 8 scenarios, unlimited users | Plan tiers are set in pounds | $105/mo billed annually | No |
Reach Reporting | Reporting across several companies | Unlimited users, multi-company, projections | Priced per connected company | $129/mo billed annually | Yes |
Clockwork | A real 3-statement model | 5-year model, 52-week cash flow | Consolidation starts a tier up | $599/mo billed annually | Yes |
Centage | A finance team that already exists | Driver-based planning, entity consolidation | Its own FAQ says it is too much under $5M | $699/mo | Yes |
Cube | Planning inside your spreadsheets | Excel and Sheets front end, multi-entity | No published price of any kind | Not published | Not listed |
Datarails | Finance teams living in Excel | Excel-native modeling, close, spend | Pricing page is quote-only; a range appears only on its blog | Not published | Yes |
Seven of the eleven others connect to QuickBooks Desktop, so the column's real use is crossing off the three that do not. It matters more than the price for anyone still on a desktop file, because a tool that cannot read your books cannot plan from them.
What you can already pull out of the system you run today is narrower than most buyers assume, a limit we work through in our CRM reporting guide.

Best for: knowing what a job actually earned before you plan anything
Overview: We are field service software, not a planning platform, and that admission is the reason this entry opens the list rather than any claim to beat the others at forecasting.
Ten of the eleven tools below forecast from your accounting file, the eleventh being Ramp, which controls the spend that lands in it. What fills that file, for a trades business, is a stream of jobs that were quoted, scheduled, worked and invoiced. Procured is where that happens, so the revenue and expense figures arrive as a by-product of running the work rather than as a data entry exercise afterward.
Revenue and expenses are tracked against the work and pushed out to the books, and the reporting sits inside the entry plan rather than above it. The job record ties the quote to the hours and the materials, which is the number most contractors cannot produce on demand.
What it does not do is plan. There is no forecast, no budget, no scenario model and no consolidation, and each of the other eleven does at least one of them. If the question is about next year, buy one of those instead.
Key features:
Pricing: One user pays $49 a month on Solo, which carries the reporting alongside quoting, invoicing, scheduling and job management. Five people are covered by Team at $75, where dispatching, live tracking and optimized routes begin. Fifteen come with Business at $145, and each person past that is $9. Stripe's processing fees apply to card payments at 2.9% plus 30 cents, and 0.8% on ACH, with no markup added by us. Trials give a fortnight of the complete Business feature set, with no card taken.
Pros: the numbers come from the work rather than from re-keying, reporting is included at the entry price, flat monthly pricing with no implementation fee, usable offline on a job site, support from a US-based team by text, email or call
Cons: no forecasting, budgeting, scenario modeling or consolidation of any kind; it is not an accounting system and does not replace one; we do not publish which accounting systems we sync to, so a shop on a QuickBooks Desktop file has to ask before relying on it; the pricing table lists full business reports and metrics on Solo but names no tier for P&L or material tracking, so treat those as positioning rather than plan contents; we publish no API and name no connector to a builder like Zapier
How to start using it:
Why it earns its place here: the forecasts the others produce are only as good as the job-level detail that reaches the books, and this is where that detail gets created rather than reconstructed afterward.
Final verdict: The right first purchase if you cannot yet say what a finished job cost, and the wrong one if you already can and need a model.

Overview: A corporate card and spend platform that gives away most of what a small contractor needs. It is the cheapest way here to control money before it is spent rather than report on it after, and it has a genuine construction practice.
Key features:
Pricing: The free plan is $0 and covers cards, expenses, accounts payable and accounting sync. Plus is $15 per user a month plus a platform fee that varies with team size and is not published. Annual billing saves 20%, and Plus has a 30-day trial. Budgets, which is the plan-versus-actual feature, sits on Plus rather than the free tier.
Pros: genuinely free for the core product, construction-specific controls, strong accounting connections
Cons: the platform fee on Plus is not published, cards require credit approval, budgeting is not on the free plan
Where it fits: a contractor who wants spend under control this month without a software budget.
Final verdict: The best value here by a distance, provided card-based spend control is the problem you have.

Overview: Reporting and light planning on top of your accounting file, with a free tier that is unusually generous for this category. It handles consolidation at a price where Fathom and Reach Reporting are still charging per company.
Key features:
Pricing: Basic is free. Standard is $23 a month, Plus $47 and Advanced $95, each published as a single monthly rate with no annual-billing discount, which is unusual in this category. There is a 14-day trial with no card.
Pros: a real free plan rather than a trial, consolidation included early, unlimited users
Cons: no annual-billing discount of any kind, ERP sources need the top tier, more than ten entities needs a conversation
Why it made this list: it does at $23 what several entries below charge hundreds for.
Final verdict: The best starting point for a contractor who wants real financial reporting tools without a project.

Overview: Built around the business plan a lender or an SBA program asks for, rather than around ongoing management. If somebody has asked you for a written plan with projections, this is the cheapest serious way to produce one.
Key features:
Pricing: Standard is $15 a month paid annually or $20 monthly, and Premium is $30 annually or $40 monthly. Promotional first-month rates appear and vary. The connection to QuickBooks or Xero, budget-versus-actual dashboards, what-if scenarios and the auto-updating forecast are all Premium, so the useful version is the $30 one.
Pros: the cheapest paid entry on this list, genuinely good at the written plan, 35-day money-back guarantee
Cons: QuickBooks Desktop support ended in 2022, the planning features that matter are Premium, one active company at a time with extras billed separately
Where it beats the alternatives: producing a document somebody else has demanded.
Final verdict: Excellent for a loan application and thin as a management tool unless you take Premium.

Overview: Management reporting with three-way forecasting, aimed at the handover between a business and its accountant, and part of the Access Group rather than independent. Reports look like something you would show a bank, which is the point.
Key features:
Pricing: Pro is $59 a month for one company, with each additional company at $59. Multi-company plans start at $315 a month for ten. It is month to month with no contract and a 14-day full-feature trial. Prices are stated in USD on the page, excluding sales tax.
Pros: strong financial analysis tools, no contract, consolidation and multi-currency included
Cons: priced per company rather than per user, which punishes anyone running two entities; no free tier; reporting depth exceeds what a small crew needs
Its real strength: turning an accounting file into a report an outsider can read.
Final verdict: The one to pick if your accountant is the audience, and overkill if nobody outside the business reads your numbers.

Overview: A long-horizon budgeting and forecasting tool that has been doing this longer than most of the list. It plans ten years out, which only Syft matches here, and it does more with the horizon.
Key features:
Pricing: Single Entity is $83 a month billed annually, which is $996 a year, or $99 monthly. Adding analytics takes it to $166 or $199, and the multi-entity consolidation plan is $333 or $399 for three users. Extra users are $25 a month annually. There is a 30-day money-back guarantee, and the pricing lives on the products page because the pricing URL returns an error.
Pros: a ten-year horizon with unlimited scenarios and user-defined formulas, transparent per-user pricing
Cons: the interface shows its age, the cloud product reads online accounting files only, the analytics tier is a separate product underneath
Why buyers shortlist it: scenario depth and custom formulas that the cheaper budget planning tools do not attempt.
Final verdict: Strong value for genuine long-range budgeting, provided your books are already in the cloud.

Overview: Cash flow forecasting and nothing else, which is why it is good at it. For a contractor whose profit looks fine while the bank account does not, this is the category that answers the question.
Key features:
Pricing: Small Business is $105 a month billed annually or $130 monthly. Growth is $215 or $265 and Scale is $315 or $389. There is a 14-day trial with no card. Note that the plan thresholds are expressed in pounds, since Float is a UK company, so the tier you qualify for is set by a revenue figure in sterling even on the dollar price list.
Pros: the clearest cash view here, unlimited users, scenario comparison built in
Cons: it connects to QuickBooks Online and Xero only, the plan boundaries are stated in a foreign currency, there is no free tier
What it is genuinely good at: showing the week the money runs out, far enough ahead to do something.
Final verdict: The best single-purpose cash tool on this list, and priced as a real commitment.

Overview: Visual reporting and projections built for accounting firms, which means it is priced by the company rather than the seat. A contractor running several entities gets more from it than one running a single business.
Key features:
Pricing: One connected company is $149 a month, or $1,548 a year, which works out at about $129 monthly. Ten companies are $290 a month and twenty-five are $550. A connection means a connected company rather than a user. There is a trial with no card, and no refunds for unused time.
Pros: unlimited users at every tier, strong multi-entity handling, good visual output
Cons: the single-company price is high for one business, it is designed around a firm serving clients, no refunds mid-cycle
Where it fits: an owner with three companies who wants one view across them.
Final verdict: Good value per company and poor value for a contractor with only one.

Overview: A genuine three-statement financial model, generated from your accounting file rather than built by hand. This is where the list stops being small-business software and starts assuming a finance function.
Key features:
Pricing: Predict is $599 a month on annual billing, Advance is $799 and Ultimate is $1,199. Monthly billing runs about 25% higher at $749, $999 and $1,499. There is a 14-day trial with no card, and plans for accounting firms start at $999. Consolidation begins at the Advance tier rather than the entry one.
Pros: a real model rather than a dashboard, unlimited users, no annual lock-in on business plans
Cons: the entry price is $7,188 a year, consolidation is a tier up, it assumes somebody will interpret the output
Why it made this list: it produces the model a bank or an investor actually asks for.
Final verdict: Serious financial analysis at a price that only makes sense above a few million in revenue.

Overview: Driver-based planning for companies with a finance team, and unusually honest about who should not buy it. Its own FAQ tells businesses under $5 million with a single entity to look elsewhere.
Key features:
Pricing: Software starts at $699 a month, priced by entity count, chart of accounts size and seats. Its own FAQ says most mid-market customers land between $18,000 and $40,000 a year once everything is counted, and implementation runs four to six weeks with no setup fee on annual plans.
Pros: it publishes a real range rather than hiding everything, strong consolidation, built for a finance team
Cons: the all-in cost is a five-figure commitment, it needs a 2 to 10 person finance team to be worth it, the implementation is measured in weeks
Where it beats the alternatives: multi-entity businesses with someone whose job is planning.
Final verdict: Well matched to $25M-plus companies and explicitly wrong for a small crew, by its own account.

Overview: Planning that keeps Excel and Google Sheets as the interface while holding the data centrally. The pitch is that your finance person keeps the tool they know.
Key features:
Pricing: Nothing is published. The tiers are named Bronze for a single legal entity, Silver for up to ten and Gold for up to fifty with multi-currency consolidation, and the FAQ says pricing is quoted per company. Figures circulating from a 2022 Cube blog post are several years out of date and should not be treated as current.
Pros: keeps spreadsheets without losing control of the numbers, clear entity tiers, broad accounting connections
Cons: no published price at any tier, QuickBooks Desktop is not in the connector list, it assumes a finance person
Why buyers pick it: nobody has to stop using Excel.
Final verdict: A sensible bridge for a finance team, and impossible to budget for without a call.

Overview: Excel-native financial planning and analysis for mid-market finance teams, now extending into spend and month-end close. It has a construction and real estate page, so the vertical is deliberate.
Key features:
Pricing: The pricing page is quote-only, with tiers named Professional, Premium and Expert, separated by users and integrations. Its own blog is more forthcoming and says most mid-market teams invest $35,000 to $80,000 a year, with enterprise plans typically above $100,000.
Pros: finance teams keep Excel, genuine depth, the vendor publishes a cost range somewhere
Cons: the real cost is a five-figure annual commitment, the pricing page itself shows nothing, it is built for a finance department rather than an owner
Where it fits: a construction business large enough to employ its own analysts.
Final verdict: Capable and far beyond what a small contractor needs, at a price its own blog puts in five figures.
The shortlist is not what ranks for this keyword, because what ranks is personal finance. We took the business financial planning market instead and filtered it for a contractor's situation, which meant price transparency, accounting connections and whether the thing works without a finance hire.
Not one number in this article was lifted from a listing site. All were taken from the vendors themselves, and two of them sit in a pricing script rather than the rendered text, so they had to be read out of the page source. One vendor's circulating price turned out to come from a 2022 blog post, which is how a stale number ends up in a dozen comparison articles.
We also checked the accounting connection per vendor rather than assuming, since that is the one dependency that decides whether any of this works. That produced the column in the table above, and it is the thing most roundups in this category leave out entirely.
One point on fit, because it cuts against the usual roundup framing. Three of these vendors do publish trades material: Ramp has a construction practice, Datarails has a construction and real estate page, and LivePlan ships a plumbing sample plan. The gap is not that nobody serves contractors. It is that the planning assumes an accounting file somebody else keeps accurate.
This is the part worth understanding before comparing features, because it decides whether any of these tools will tell you something you did not already know.
Every forecasting entry here reads from your accounting system. It takes the revenue and cost history in QuickBooks or Xero, applies assumptions, and projects forward. That works well when the history is accurate and granular, and it fails quietly when it is not.
For a trades business the usual failure is the same one every time. The books say revenue and they say cost of goods sold, but they do not say which job lost money and why. A forecast built on that tells you the business grew 8% and cannot tell you that two kitchen remodels ate the year's profit.
The fix is upstream rather than in the planning tool. If the hours, materials and change orders are captured against the job as the work happens, the accounting file inherits that detail and the forecast becomes worth something. That is also why cost estimation sits before any of this rather than after it.
Cash timing is the second thing the books hide. One person on Reddit, who does the forecasting at a mid-market construction firm, described treating every project as its own business unit and rolling project billings and costs up into the company forecast.
In the same thread on Reddit they noted that invoices can float 90 to 120 days and 10% retention is held to the end, which is why they forecast cash directly rather than trusting a profit figure. That is one person's experience rather than a survey, and it describes a multi-family builder rather than a service trade, but the timing problem is universal.
If the reason you are here is that somebody asked for a plan, the requirement is more specific than most of these tools suggest.
An established business is expected to include income statements, balance sheets and cash flow statements for the last three to five years, plus a forward-looking section covering the next five years of the same three statements and capital expenditure budgets, a structure the Small Business Administration sets out in its own business-plan guidance. For the first year it suggests quarterly or even monthly projections.
Read against the list above, that tells you something useful. The historical half comes out of your accounting system and needs no software purchase at all. The forward half is what you are actually buying, and most of these tools produce it in an afternoon once they are connected.
The alternative to buying any of it is paying somebody. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures put the median wage for accountants and auditors at $83,680 a year, against about 1.6 million people doing the job. A fractional version of that is what most contractors actually use, and it is the honest benchmark against a $599 monthly subscription.
Headline prices in this category mislead, because some are per user, some per company and some per entity. The table below prices a single contracting business with one person doing the planning, on annual billing where it is offered.
Tool | Plan priced | Cost for one business | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
Ramp | Free | $0 | Budgets need Plus at $15 per user |
Syft Analytics | Basic, then Standard | $0 to $23/mo | One monthly rate, no annual discount |
LivePlan | Premium | $30/mo | Standard lacks the planning features |
Procured | Solo | $49/mo, 1 user | Records jobs; does not forecast |
Fathom | Pro | $59/mo | Per company, not per user |
PlanGuru | Single Entity | $83/mo | $996 a year |
Float | Small Business | $105/mo | Thresholds set in pounds |
Reach Reporting | 1 connection | $129/mo | Annual; $149 monthly |
Clockwork | Predict | $599/mo | $7,188 a year |
Centage | Entry | $699/mo | Its FAQ says $18,000 to $40,000 all-in |
Cube, Datarails | Not published | Not published | Datarails' blog says $35,000 to $80,000 |
The ladder has a visible break in it. Up to about $130 a month you are buying a connection to your accounting file and a view on top of it. Above $599 you are buying a model and, implicitly, somebody to run it. There is very little sold in between, which is worth knowing before you ask for a quote from the bottom of the list.
For most contractors the honest answer sits in the first half of that table, and the gross margin figures feeding it matter far more than which tool draws the chart.
For a lot of trades businesses, yes, and for longer than the vendors suggest.
Ramp costs nothing and covers cards, expenses, bill pay and accounting sync, which is most of what a small contractor needs from finance management tools. Syft's free Basic plan adds dashboards and graphs with unlimited users on top of your accounting file, while financial reports, consolidation and forecasting start at $23. Between them they cover capture at no cost, with a dashboard view on top.
There are two points where the free version runs out. Forward-looking work is one: budgets and plan-versus-actual both sit behind a paid tier. Multiple entities are the other, since consolidation is the thing you end up paying for.
The more useful question is whether a planning tool is the right purchase at all. If you cannot yet say what last month's jobs cost you, the shortfall sits in the record rather than the forecast, and buying financial optimization tools to sit on top of incomplete data makes the output more confident without making it more true.
A free reporting tier plus an accurate reconciliation answers more questions than a paid forecast does, which is why the ledger balance is worth understanding before you subscribe to anything.
Match the purchase to the question you actually have.
If the question is where the money went, start with capture. Ramp is free and controls spend before it leaves, and the job-level detail that makes any later forecast meaningful comes from the system running the work.
If the question is what next quarter looks like, Syft at $23 or LivePlan Premium at $30 will answer it from your existing books. If it is specifically about cash rather than profit, Float is built for that single question and nothing else.
If you run several entities or employ someone whose job is planning, the top of the list becomes reasonable. Clockwork and Centage both produce genuine models, and Centage says plainly in its own FAQ that a single-entity business under $5 million does not need it.
Whatever you choose, get the inputs right first. A contractor who can say what each job earned has something worth forecasting, and a general contractor who cannot will get a tidy chart built on a number nobody trusts.